Inoculant and Imidacloprid

— Written By
en Español

El inglés es el idioma de control de esta página. En la medida en que haya algún conflicto entre la traducción al inglés y la traducción, el inglés prevalece.

Al hacer clic en el enlace de traducción se activa un servicio de traducción gratuito para convertir la página al español. Al igual que con cualquier traducción por Internet, la conversión no es sensible al contexto y puede que no traduzca el texto en su significado original. NC State Extension no garantiza la exactitud del texto traducido. Por favor, tenga en cuenta que algunas aplicaciones y/o servicios pueden no funcionar como se espera cuando se traducen.

English is the controlling language of this page. To the extent there is any conflict between the English text and the translation, English controls.

Clicking on the translation link activates a free translation service to convert the page to Spanish. As with any Internet translation, the conversion is not context-sensitive and may not translate the text to its original meaning. NC State Extension does not guarantee the accuracy of the translated text. Please note that some applications and/or services may not function as expected when translated.

Collapse ▲


I think I remembered that Admire Pro & Lift can be tank mixed. Is that right?


Yes… See page 164, lines 2-8… [2015 Peanut Information]

AND, here is an abstract Rick and I presented at the 8 th National IPM Meeting (well, we sent a poster to the meeting)

Developing strategies to manage thrips in peanut in absence of aldicarb

*R. Brandenburg1,, D. Jordan1, B. Royals1, and D. Johnson1

1North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.

Tobacco thrips can have a major impact of peanut yield if control measures are not implemented especially in North Carolina where the growing season for peanut is relatively short and injury can delay crop development. With the removal of aldicarb from the peanut market, alternative strategies are needed to protect peanut yield from thrips injury. In small-plot experiments over three years, imidacloprid controlled thrips and protected peanut yield equally or more effective than phorate or acephate applied in the seed furrow at planting. In some instances postemergence applications of acephate were not needed when following imidacloprid but often increased control and yield when following acephate or phorate applied in the seed furrow. Imidacloprid was compatible with Bradyrhizobia applied in the seed furrow at planting as an essential component of biological nitrogen fixation and did not increase incidence of tomato spotted wilt of peanut when the tolerant cultivar Bailey was planted. The current risk index for managing TSWV has been modified to reflect use of imidacloprid in peanut.

Article first appeared as North Carolina Peanut Note (PNNC-2015-012)