Comments on Gypsum Peanut Notes No. 2 2026

Find this article at:
go.ncsu.edu/readext?1109892
— Written By
en Español / em Português
Español

El inglés es el idioma de control de esta página. En la medida en que haya algún conflicto entre la traducción al inglés y la traducción, el inglés prevalece.

Al hacer clic en el enlace de traducción se activa un servicio de traducción gratuito para convertir la página al español. Al igual que con cualquier traducción por Internet, la conversión no es sensible al contexto y puede que no traduzca el texto en su significado original. NC State Extension no garantiza la exactitud del texto traducido. Por favor, tenga en cuenta que algunas aplicaciones y/o servicios pueden no funcionar como se espera cuando se traducen.

Português

Inglês é o idioma de controle desta página. Na medida que haja algum conflito entre o texto original em Inglês e a tradução, o Inglês prevalece.

Ao clicar no link de tradução, um serviço gratuito de tradução será ativado para converter a página para o Português. Como em qualquer tradução pela internet, a conversão não é sensivel ao contexto e pode não ocorrer a tradução para o significado orginal. O serviço de Extensão da Carolina do Norte (NC State Extension) não garante a exatidão do texto traduzido. Por favor, observe que algumas funções ou serviços podem não funcionar como esperado após a tradução.

English

English is the controlling language of this page. To the extent there is any conflict between the English text and the translation, English controls.

Clicking on the translation link activates a free translation service to convert the page to Spanish. As with any Internet translation, the conversion is not context-sensitive and may not translate the text to its original meaning. NC State Extension does not guarantee the accuracy of the translated text. Please note that some applications and/or services may not function as expected when translated.

Collapse ▲

The following information can be used while deciding how to approach calcium needs for Virginia market types. These recommendations are based in part on data from trials but also from discussions with crop consultants in North Carolina with a great deal of experience helping farmers manage peanuts. I will post some of the data that form the basis of these recommendations at a later date.

There is a lot of variation in how peanut yield is linked to soil calcium (note the variation in response to Virginia market types compared to the closer relationship for runner market types from figures found in an older book chapter.) Response can be unpredictable.

However, logistics and expense of gypsum have many of us asking how can we make life easier around this input without creating excessive risk.

Virginia market types need gypsum. But I have considerable data showing that rates lower than what we recommend as our 1X rate are just as effective in many cases. A major assumption is if products can be applied uniformly at lower rates than those in our production guide. As we approach the application window for gypsum in the 2026 crop, I’ll follow up with more details.

A Single Rate Applied Across the Entire Field without Grid Sampling and Variable Rate Application
1. Applying the recommended rate in Table 3-10 regardless of soil calcium level is the least risky in terms of achieving a positive yield and market grade response to gypsum for Virginia market types.
2. Applying 70% of the recommended rate in Table 3-10 regardless of soil calcium level increases risk of not realizing the highest yield and market grades offered by the recommended rate in Table 3-10. However, the lower rate can be as effective as the recommended rate in Table 3-10 in many fields with a lower cost and fewer logistical challenges.
Possible Alternatives to Broadcast Applications of the Same Rate Across the Entire Field
1. Using the Relationship of Soil Calcium in Pounds Calcium per Acre to Target the Gypsum Rate
Using soil calcium level has proven inconsistent in determining if a response to gypsum will occur for Virginia market types. However, increased cost of gypsum and logistical challenges in moving gypsum to farms and making timely applications has created situations where lower rates than recommended in Table 3-10 are increasingly attractive. The following are rules of thumb that are reasonable alternatives to applying the recommended rate of gypsum across fields if grid sampling information is available.
A. If 1000 pounds calcium per acre in soil or greater, apply 50% of recommended rate in Table 3-10. If 50% cannot be applied uniformly, increase the rate until you reach the lowest rate that can be applied uniformly.
B. If 700-1000 pounds calcium per acre in soil, apply 75% of recommended rate in Table 3-10.
C. If <700 pounds calcium per acre in soil, apply recommended rate in Table 3-10.
2. Do not apply gypsum if soil pH during the cropping cycle is expected to be 5.6 or lower.
share Share This Article