Soil pH and Gypsum Interactions Peanut Notes No. 11 2022
El inglés es el idioma de control de esta página. En la medida en que haya algún conflicto entre la traducción al inglés y la traducción, el inglés prevalece.
Al hacer clic en el enlace de traducción se activa un servicio de traducción gratuito para convertir la página al español. Al igual que con cualquier traducción por Internet, la conversión no es sensible al contexto y puede que no traduzca el texto en su significado original. NC State Extension no garantiza la exactitud del texto traducido. Por favor, tenga en cuenta que algunas aplicaciones y/o servicios pueden no funcionar como se espera cuando se traducen.
English is the controlling language of this page. To the extent there is any conflict between the English text and the translation, English controls.
Clicking on the translation link activates a free translation service to convert the page to Spanish. As with any Internet translation, the conversion is not context-sensitive and may not translate the text to its original meaning. NC State Extension does not guarantee the accuracy of the translated text. Please note that some applications and/or services may not function as expected when translated.Collapse ▲
Jordan Question to Soil Chemists and Fertility Experts About pH and Gypsum
I have an old data set that shows that at pH 6 there is a positive response to gypsum but at lower pH there can be a negative response (pH 5.6.) Any explanation as to why calcium sulfate would cause a reduction in yield at the lower pH? Is there a chance the low pH is further depressed or is there an interaction that is making Al (aluminum) more available? I did not have many rates but some of the data suggests a rate response (increasing gypsum rate at pH 5.6 has a greater negative impact.) I’ve been showing these data for a couple of years and every now and then I get a “why?” I point to a possible further reduction in pH and possibly greater availability of Al. But I’m not really sure on the mechanism. Gypsum is put out around 45 days after planting and it takes about 140 days to reach optimum maturity for harvest. Thanks for any thoughts you might have.
A summary of the data set can be found at the following link:
Yes, your answer is essentially correct. If pH is low, the Al on the exchange sites is exchanged by Ca, increasing solution Al making acidity worse. It will react with water and further lower pH.
Jordan Follow Up
Also, is there a greater chance we are seeing more aluminum toxicity? My understanding is that on our mineral soils lower pH and greater aluminum toxicity are related.
Yes. From what I read, on mineral soils a pH of about 5.6 is where exchangeable trivalent Al is possibly still on exchange sites. It’s kind of a breaking point for soluble Al presence. This would vary some depending on OM levels since Al can react with it and be complexed…insoluble.
As David Hardy said, the calcium will displace Al3+ from the CEC, pushing it to the soil solution. Once in the soil solution, it will occur Al hydrolysis, releasing H+ and increasing acidity. When studying Al hydrolysis in DI (deionized) water, trivalent Al only exists in pH below 5.5. In mineral soils, it is still possible to have Al3+ at pH 5.6 because of the interaction with other ions in the soil solution. It is possible the existence some Al3+ even at pH 5.7 if there is a lot of dissolved organic carbon in the soil solution. However, when under the effect of DOC, Al3+ is less toxic for plants because plants don’t uptake the DOC-Al complex. The interaction DOC-Al is well studied in no-till soils, where there is trivalent Al but less toxic for plants than in conventional tillage. In no-till, DOC is constantly released in the soil solution, while in CT the DOC decomposition occurs all at once when the plant residues are incorporated into the soil.